Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2013 (5) TMI 726

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ndent: Shri Nagesh Pathak, Authorized Representative (DR) JUDGEMENT Per. Archana Wadhwa :- After dispensing with the condition of pre-deposit of penalty, we proceed to decide the appeal itself in as much as we find that the issue stands decided by the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court. 2. The original Adjudicating Authority while confirming the demand of service tax and imposing pena....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... reported in 2006 (1) S.T.R. 185 (Ker.) laying down that incidence of imposition of penalties under the two sections are distinguish and separate and if offences are committed in courses of same transaction or arise out of same act, separate penalties are imposable for ingredients of both the offences. 5. Learned advocate submits that the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court decision is later in....