2013 (5) TMI 516

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....;                            For the Respondent: Shri Parmod Kumar, JC (AR) JUDGEMENT Per P.K. Das; In this case, there is a demand of Customs duty of Rs.4,23,13,822/- and excise duty of Rs.22,27,604/- and penalty of Rs.60 lakhs under the Customs Act an....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sion, if consideration of the twin requirements, viz. Undue hardship and      safeguarding the interest of the Revenue is kept in mind, for the reasons stated above, we are convinced that there cannot be a total waiver of the deposit as prayed for by the appellant in the case on hand. We, however, feel that the deposit of Rs.76 lakhs as directed by the Tribunal can be reduced t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....2010 are closed. 3. The learned advocate submits that they have not deposited the amount of Rs.40 lakhs in terms of the judgement of the High Court. He submits that they have filed review petition before the Hon'ble High Court which is still pending. He also submits that after the stay order, they filed an application on 23.8.2010 before this Tribunal for modification of the stay order dt. 14.6....