2013 (5) TMI 288
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rnment application. After passing order by Hon'ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh on 10.5.2012 in Writ Petition No. 6761/2012 against stay order passed by the Tribunal on 14.3.2012, appellant failed to cause appearance and explain its case despite repeated notices issued listing the matter on 7.6.12, 14.8.12, 1.10.12, 30.1.12 & 16.1.13. It appears that the appellant has no cause to explain the delay....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ra 6 of application dated 14.8.2010. The appellant has explained that after receipt of the impugned order he approached the counsel Shri Arun Das of Jabalpur for legal remedy. But that counsel having faced criminal proceedings as stated in Para 4 of the application the appellant could not avail his services. Affidavit of the counsel Shri Arun Das attested by Oath Commissioner on 14.8.2010 is avail....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t appears that the appellant deliberately suppressed the fact of implication of the concerned counsel in criminal proceedings before limitation expired to prove his bona fide before law. 4. Record further reveals that the Counsels Shri Kamal Khemka, Shri Sanjay Mishra as well as Shri Ajay Mishra engaged in this appeal executed Vakalatnama on 14th August, 2010. Shri Sanjay Mishra, advocate also ....
TaxTMI