2013 (5) TMI 207

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he petitioner medical institution is before this Court raising a grievance in respect of the callous inaction on the part of the first respondent in not effecting the refund of entry tax remitted by the petitioner, despite the order passed by the appellate authority vide Ext.P4. 2. The case of the petitioner is that, the petitioner is running a hospital in Ernakulam and in the course of steps f....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....oner preferred a statutory appeal. 3. In spite of the pendency of the appeal, the respondents proceeded with steps under the R.R. Act by issuing Ext.P1 notice which made the petitioner to approach this Court by filing W.P. (C).No. 18971/2004, wherein an interim order was passed on 28.6.2004 granting interim stay on condition that the petitioner satisfed a sum of Rs.50,000/-(Rupees fifty thousan....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Ext.P7 judgment in W.P.(C) No.34899/2007 seeking for similar benefit. 4. No counter affidavit has been filed by the respondents so far. 5. The learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits that the verdict passed by this Court in Thressiamma L. Chirayil V. State of Kerala (2007 (1) KLT 303), has been subjected to challenge by filing an appeal before the Supreme Court, whic....