2013 (5) TMI 184
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... by the department, respondent in appeals E/1153 and 1154/2012 filed by the assessee-company and its Managing Director respectively. The two stay applications filed by the appellants were disposed of by this bench on 08.11.2012 vide Stay Order No. 1771/2012 wherein the payment already made of the amount of duty was noted by the bench and the assessee was directed to pre-deposit an amount of Rs. 50....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s application is, therefore, rejected. 2. The application filed by the department points out certain mistakes apparent from the record. What were disposed of this bench on 08.11.2012 were two stay applications viz. No. 787/2012 and No. 786/2012, the former filed by the assessee-company and the latter by its Managing Director. The stenographer who took the dictation on that day mindlessly typed ....
TaxTMI