2013 (4) TMI 276
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel on behalf of the respondents. 2. This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the order of the second respondent, dated 24.02.2012, made in the stay application filed in the appeal, in A.No.119/2011-TRY(CE), pending on the file of the second respondent. 3.By the impugned order, dated 24....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....2011-Try (CE), and dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period. On the petitioner making a pre-deposit of a sum of Rs.6,00,000/-, within a period of two weeks from today, in compliance of the impugned order of the second respondent, dated 24.02.2012. 5. Per contra, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents had submitted that the p....
TaxTMI