2013 (4) TMI 124

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ndaram ORDER The petitioner seeks issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the respondent in his proceedings in TIN 33490780672/2012-2013, to quash the proceedings dated 21.12.2012, and to direct the respondent to take up the provisional/original assessment of the petitioner for the assessment year 2012-13 after passing fresh orders for 2007-08 and 2008-09 in ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 3. The primary plea taken by the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner is that earlier this Court by order dated 6.12.2010 made in W.P.No.9060 of 2010 directed the respondent/department to pass final order and no such order has been passed and therefore, these notices issued time and again is causing prejudice. The relevant portion of the said order dated 6.12.2010 reads as follows: "5. I....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sing such orders." 4. It is also the petitioner's plea that the respondent/department is keeping the matter pending for a long time and thereby prejudice is caused to the petitioner. 5. Heard Mr.Manoharsundaram, learned Government Advocate (Taxes) for the respondents, who states that the Court may direct the respondent to hear the objections and pass final order on merits within a time frame....