2013 (3) TMI 85

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....al for the appellant Mr. P.S. Jetly for respondent. ORDER 1. Whether CESTAT by its impugned decision dated 6th June, 2012 was justified in directing the appellant to deposit 50% of the duty confirmed by the Adjudicating Authority for entertaining the appeal against the order-in-original is the question raised in this appeal. 2. The appeal is admitted on the above question and taken up ....