2013 (1) TMI 484

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... RESPONDENT BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, INCOME TAX   JUDGMENT Heard the Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the Revenue. 2. Petitioners are Co-operative Societies. First petitioner has been issued Exts.P3, P5 and P7 notices and the 2nd petitioner has been issued Exts.P8 and P9 notices. By these notices, information as provided under Section 142(1) of the Incom....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e proceedings. On this basis Counsel seeks interference of this court, in this writ petition. 4. From the submission made on behalf of the petitioners itself, it is obvious that the proceedings which are the subject matter of the SLP now pending before the Apex Court were under Section 133(6) of the Income Tax Act, where as the impugned notices which are called in question in this writ petition, ....