2013 (1) TMI 77
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....eaching the registered office of the Company no signboard was found there; the same was the position qua the factory premises; on reaching there no signboard was found of the factory either. Vipin Sahni, the landlord was contacted who informed that the factory premises was situated at Sector 58, Noida U.P.; on reaching there, the factory was found in possession of UPFC, NOIDA and a small board indicating that person interested in purchase of the said property can contact the UPFC, Noida. The factory premises thus could not be sealed. On enquiry, it was revealed that the said plot was in the name of Enn Vee Electicals (P) Ltd. which was mortgaged to the corporation against financial assistance granted to Enn Vee Electicals (P) Ltd. 3. The....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....x-directors of the Company were recorded under rule 130 of the Company Court Rules wherein it was revealed that another company, namely, Kalpatru Export (P) Ltd. had purchased the factory premises of the Company (in liqn.). In this scenario, the Official Liquidator could not take possession of any moveable and immoveable assets of the Company. 7. In spite of best efforts the addresses of the other ex-directors could not be traced. On 21.02.2012, the Official Liquidator had been directed to handover the claim notices to Vipin Sahni for inviting claims. Symbolic possession of the premises of the Company at C-42 Sector 2, Noida UP was taken; it was informed that this property had been purchased by Kalpatru Export (P) Ltd. in 1994-....
TaxTMI