Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2013 (1) TMI 67

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... and consumable stores as on 31.03.2007." 2. The brief facts giving rise to the appeal may be noted. We are concerned with the assessment year 2007-08. The appellant-assessee is a private limited company engaged in the manufacture and sale of motorcycles. In the return of income, an amount of Rs. 1,58,70,623/- was claimed as deduction on account of inventory written off. In the course of the assessment proceedings under Section 143(3) of the Act, the assessee was asked to justify the claim which it did by pointing out that the claim consisted of Rs. 1,23,36,086/- being the amount of raw material component and consumables written off and Rs. 35,34,537/- being the amount of finished goods written off. The assessee claimed that it was consi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er failed to appreciate that since the aforesaid amount had already been taxed in the assessment year 2006-07, the same could not be brought to tax in the year under appeal and therefore, the loss of Rs. 116,48,29,528 had to be increased by the said amount of Rs. 8,68,81,641.     FINDING     The Assessing Officer is hereby directed to verify the facts and then allow the loss." 5. The revenue carried the matter in appeal before the Tribunal and questioned the decision of the CIT(Appeals) to delete the addition. Its case was that the claim represented a contingent liability and was not allowable as deduction. The Tribunal, after adverting to the rival contentions in detail accepted the contention of the ....