2012 (12) TMI 668

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....EMENT Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, as well as the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. 2. It has been stated that the petitioner is working, as an Accounts Executive, in Infosys Technology Limited, Chennai, and he is an assesee on the files of the second respondent. The petitioner had filed the original return of income, for the assessment year 1....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....alary of the petitioner and it had been deposited in the department account, on 24.12.1999. 4. It has been further stated that the demand raised by the Deputy Commissioner Income Tax, TDS, Bangalore, had been challenged before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) IV, Bangalore. The said appeal had been rejected by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), by an order, dated 12.9.2000. There....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rt had passed a number of orders directing the respondent Department to refund the amounts deducted as tax, along with the interest accrued thereon. He had placed copies of such orders before this Court in support of his claims. One such order is, dated 1.4.2010, made in W.P.No.5860 of 2010. He had also placed reliance on the decision of a Division Bench of this Court, dated 23.12.2011, in a batch....