2012 (12) TMI 588

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....relation to company in liquidation, Kishangarh Fabrics Ltd. The Official Liquidator after admitting the claim of the applicant-bank to the tune of Rs.45,82,948/-, has rejected the other part of the claim to the extent of Rs.40,37,173.70; and has served the notice while stating as under: - "Take Notice that as the Official Liquidator of the above-named company, I have this day rejected your claim of Rs. 40,37,173.70 on the following grounds: - (1)  Interest amounting to Rs. 40,11,173.70 pertaining to the period from 19.10.2002 to 31.04.2009 has been rejected on the ground that it is pertaining to the period after the winding up and the same is not admissible in the winding up. (2)  The Advocates fees amounting to Rs. 11,00....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er i.e., 18.10.2002 and costs awarded by the DRT. It is, however, submitted that the claim of interest amounting to Rs. 40,11,173.70 for the period 19.10.2002 to 31.04.2009 has been rejected on the ground that it pertains to the period after the date of the order of the winding up and is not admissible as a priority claim per Rule 154 of the Rules of 1959. 5. The learned counsel Mr. Chanda appearing for the applicant-bank submits that apart from disallowing the part of the claim of the applicant, the Official Liquidator, despite having realized the amount from sale of the assets of the company in liquidation, has not yet disbursed the amount so received; and this omission is causing heavy loss to the bank. The learned counsel Mr. Balia a....