Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2012 (11) TMI 928

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....NL AGARWALA for Opponent(s): 1,   MR TUSHAR P HEMANI for Opponent(s): 1,   MS VAIBHAVI K PARIKH for Opponent(s): 1,   ORAL ORDER   (Per : HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE SONIA GOKANI)   Revenue has challenged the order of the Tribunal dated 22nd October 2010 proposing following question for our consideration : "Whether the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... which is under challenge in the present Tax Appeal proposing aforementioned question of law. The Tribunal has essentially relied on an earlier case of Dr.Satish Gupta where identical question had been decided. It found that there was no variation in the returned income and therefore, there was no basis for levying of penalty. It emerges further from the record that neither there was any questi....