2012 (11) TMI 820

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., for the Respondent. [Order per : M.V. Ravindran, Member (J)]. -  This order is directed against Order-in-Appeal No. Commr.(A)/229/VDR-II/2006, dated 1-12-06. 2. When this matter was called out, none appears on behalf of the appellant but appellant has filed a letter seeking adjournment on the ground that they have engaged new counsel. On perusal of the records, we find that th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ual to 8%/10% of the total value of the exempted goods cleared during the period May 2004 September 2004. Coming to such a conclusion, both the lower authorities have held that removal of impugned goods by the appellant only by reversal of proportionate Cenvat credit availed as inputs was legally incorrect and were required to pay 8%/10% of the value of the exempted goods. 5. On perusal of....