Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2012 (11) TMI 725

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rthquake affected areas in Gujarat through approved agency. The petitioner having manufactured the said goods, claimed to have supplied the same to the approved agency for the purpose of relief and rehabilitation work in the earthquake affected areas of the State. The petitioner in terms of Exemption Notification No. 2/2001, dated 27-1-2001 desired to avail exemption from payment of excise duty, for which purpose, the petitioner needed to obtain a certificate from the Competent Authority. The petitioner applied for such certificate. However, the concerned authority, namely the District Magistrate refused to issue the certificate as prayed for. Notification No. 2/2001, dated 27-1-2001 reads as follows : "Donations for relief and rehabilit....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... or the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, as the case may be, within three months from the date of removal of the goods or within such extended period as the said officer may allow, a certificate from the District Magistrate of the affected area in the State of Gujarat that the said goods have been donated for use for the aforesaid purpose. 2. This notification shall remain in force upto and inclusive of the 31st day of July, 2001. 2. In the meantime, Excise Department in absence of such certificate instituted and completed the adjudicating proceedings and raised the duty demand. It appears that the petitioner's appeal against such order of the competent authority was pending before the appellate authority. At that s....