Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2012 (11) TMI 562

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Appellant. None, for the Respondent. [Order per : Bhaskar Bhattacharya, ACJ (Oral)]. - Tax Appeal No. 1332 of 2011 is at the instance of the revenue in a proceeding under Section 35(G) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 ("the Act") and is directed against an order dated March 17, 2011 passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, West Zonal Bench, Ahmedabad ["the Tribunal"]....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... on the basis of invoices issued by the 1st and 2nd stage dealers and not on the basis of commercial invoices issued by M/s. Darmin Steel Suppliers under whose delivery challan and commercial invoices, the payments were made. The Tribunal found that Circular No. 218/52/96-CX, dated June 4, 1996, issued by the Board covered the situation like the present one. The Tribunal further found that even th....