Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2012 (11) TMI 222

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t tax at sour under section 194J of the Act on the amount of Rs.12,00,000/- paid by the assessee-company to its holding-company and consequently, confirming the disallowance made u/s. 40(a)(ia) of the Act for non-deduction of tax at source on such payment. 3. The facts relating to the said issue are stated in brief. The assessee-company is a subsidiary company of M/s Steel Industrials Kerala Ltd. It is engaged in the business of manufacturing of steel forging. During the course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer noticed that the assessee has paid a sum of Rs. 12.00 lakhs to its holding company and claimed the same as expenses. The Assessing Officer took the view that the assessee is liable to deduct tax at source on the sai....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ing the course of the year, the provisions of sec. 40(a)(ia) shall not apply to the said payment. In this regard, he relied on the Special Bench of ITAT, Visakhapatnam Bench in the case of M/s. Merilyn Shipping and Transports vs. ACIT (136 ITD (SB) 23). 5. On the contrary, the Ld. DR submitted that the assessee has been receiving various types of services such as recruitment and training to staffs and other HR activities, liaisoning with the Government Departments etc. The Ld. DR submitted that these kinds of services would fall in the category of technical services and hence, the provisions of sec. 194J shall squarely apply to the assessee. 6. We have heard the rival contentions and perused the record. Before the Assessing Officer, t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y the Holding Compnay SILK". Thus, it is seen that the amount of Rs.12.00 lakhs was paid in connection with various types of services referred supra and it is claimed that part of the said amount is paid towards rent also. 7. Now the question that arises is Whether the services mentioned above would fall in the category of "Technical services", which would attract the provisions of sec. 194J of the Act. According to sec. 194J of the Act, the fee for technical services shall have the same meaning as given in Explanation 2 to clause (vii) of sub-section(1) of section 9. The Explanation 2 to clause (vii) of sub-section (1) of section 9 reads as under: Explanation 2. For the purposes of the clause, "fees for technical services" means a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....g company. In view of the above discussion and in view of section 194J r.w.s. 9(1) and Board's Circular the payment made by the appellant is that of payment for technical services. The assessee was required to deduct tax from the payment of Rs. 12,00,000/- to SILK which attracts the provision of sec. 40(a)(ia)". 9. We are also of the view that the various types of services rendered by the holding company to the assessee would fall either in the category of "managerial services" or "Consultancy services" and in any case both the types of services would fall under the definition of "Fee for technical services". However, on a careful consideration of the explanation furnished before the AO, we notice that the amount of Rs.12.00 lakhs also i....