Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2012 (11) TMI 148

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ppellant. Shri V.P. Namasivayam, for the Respondent. [Order per : Chittaranjan Satapathy, Member (T)]. -  Heard both sides. The respondents are manufacturing lay flat tubings and captively using the same for making plastic bags. It is the case of the department that under the applicable Notification No. 16/97, lay flat tubings are entitled to small scale exemption subject to the cond....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....in this case, the plastic bags were exempted under Notification No. 4/97), the inputs namely lay flat tubings cannot be deemed to be exempt under paragraph 3(c). As such, w.e.f. 3-12-97, the clearances of lay flat tubings were required to be computed. 2. In view of Tribunal's decision in the case of Gothi Thermoforming Industries v. C.C.E. Chennai & Pondicherry - 2007 (211) E.L.T. 97 holdi....