Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2012 (10) TMI 813

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t Chakraborty, C.A.   Respondent by: Shri RL Garg, C.A.   Respondent by : Shri Sudhir Sharma, C.A.   O R D E R   PER BENCH   These four appeals are filed by the Revenue, pertaining to different assesses and are represented by different Counsels. As the issue arising in all the four Revenue appeals is same, for the sake of convenience they are heard together ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....de these payments. Thereafter the Assessing Officer passed an order under Section 154 accepting the submission of the assessee and determining the demand at 'nil'. 4. On the original intimation under Section 200A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the assessee has filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), New Delhi. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dismissed the appeal ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....fore us. The sole ground of Revenue is that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), while dismissing the appeal of the assessee as not maintainable, erred in giving directions to the Assessing Officer to take corrective action. 5. After hearing rival contentions we hold that the issue raised by the Revenue is an academic question as the Assessing Officer has already rectified his orders passe....