2012 (10) TMI 312

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... & Co. for the Respondents. ORAL JUDGMENT. : [Per S.J. Vazifdar, J.]   1. This is an appeal under section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The appellant contends that the following questions of law arise in this appeal : (A) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Hon'ble Tribunal is justified in ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....finding in favour of the respondent and against the department in respect of the finding on question (A). As we have answered question (A) sought to be raised, against the appellant, the answer to question (C) must also be against the appellant. 3. The main question here is whether the transfer of the shares by the assessee took place on 22nd December, 1992 as contended by the appellant, or on ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... and such other applicable provisions of the Companies Act, 1956, 4,07,320 shares of Rs.60/- per share. (2) the purchaser has this day paid to the vendor, the sum of Rs.1200/- as and by way of earnest money and balance of purchase money amounting to Rs.2,44,38,000/- shall be paid at the time of completion of the purchase. (3) The purchaser agrees to obtain the permission of the Central Gover....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....re were several conditions to be performed by the parties as a condition precedent to the shares vesting in the purchaser. The agreement was subject to ATCL receiving permission from the Central Government under the provisions of the Companies Act, including section 372 thereof. Had the permission been refused, the agreement could not have gone through. The agreement on its terms was to be null an....