2012 (10) TMI 1

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., for the Respondent. [Order]. - None present for the Appellant. Keeping the matter pending is of no use when the appeal relates to the year 2008. When the appellant claimed that there were damage to the inputs by fire they should adduce evidence before the adjudicating authority. That authority accordingly denied the admissibility of Cenvat credit on those inputs. Page 27 of appeal folder c....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....m was settled by the competent authority for Rs. 21,15,317/- for loss/damage of stock, plant machinery and building due to the fire. It is also confirmed that no Excise/Cenvat claim has been paid under the above mentioned claim." 2. The settlement made by the Insurance company was communicated on 24-4-2007. The first appellate order was passed on 23-5-2008. Communication of Insurance compa....