Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2012 (9) TMI 781

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Gangadhar J.M. for the Respondent. JUDGMENT 1. The Revenue has preferred this appeal against the order passed by the appellate tribunal allowing the appeal filed by the assessee on the ground that when the demands are dropped on any account, then in such a situation, penal provisions cannot survive against the assessee. 2. The assessee was served with a show-cause notice calling upon them....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... order dated 26.10.2006 held that the assessee has made strong arguments in support of judicial pronouncement regarding their contentions that the CENVAT Credit cannot be denied on account of incorrect depreciation claimed initially and later rectified. Following the judgments of the Tribunal in the case of Terana Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. v. CCE 2001 (138) ELT 1225 (Trib. - Mum.) has....