2012 (9) TMI 538
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... JUDGMENT Manjula Chellur, Ag. C.J. Heard learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned counsel appearing for the respondent. The Department at whose instance the judgment came to be passed is before us aggrieved by the review order of the judgment dated 28.03.2012. The judgment dated 28.03.2012 reads as under: "This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....unded to the assessee as per the circular at Ext.P3. 3. The grievance of the appellant review petitioner is, in the address given in the chalan, the parties are not residing and the communication returned to the Department with the endorsement "address left". Therefore, the Department had to entertain the doubts regarding the bonafides of the person who approached them, claiming refund, with a ph....