Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2012 (9) TMI 396

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... that in the absence of any failure on his part to disclose fully and truly all material facts for such assessment, reopening beyond the period of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year is not permissible. The assessee also contends that the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer are not sufficient to permit reopening. It is the contention of the petitioner that the reasons recorded do not form sufficient basis to enable the Assessing Officer to hold a belief that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. Thus, the petitioner seeks to challenge the reopening of assessment on twin grounds of the reopening being beyond the period of four years without any failure on his part to truly and fully disclose all material ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....i) of the Act for the interest paid on borrowed fund for making investments for purchase of shares of Mastek Ltd. When the issue was presented before the Division Bench, the learned Members comprising the Bench had a difference of opinion. Such petitions were, therefore, referred to a third Member for his opinion. The third Member by his order dated March 16, 2012, concurred with the ultimate conclusion recorded by one of the two Members to the effect that the petitions are required to be allowed. This was primarily on the ground that there was no failure on the part of the assessee to disclose truly and fully all material facts necessary for assessment. In that view of the matter, considering the proviso to section 147 of the Act, the cour....