2012 (9) TMI 387
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....NT (PER J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) 1) This petition is filed to challenge the order in original dated 17th September, 1998 as well as the order passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) on 30th October, 1998. 2) Although appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Customs (A) is maintainable before the CESTAT, since the petition filed to challenge the order passed by the Comm....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....hose duty paid goods. In support of their above contention, the petitioner as well as Aslam produced receipts issued by the customs authorities at Trivandrum. However, after noticing some discrepancies in the goods and the customs receipts, the assessing officer disbelieved their claim and by order in original confiscated the goods and gave option to the petitioner and Aslam to redeem the goods on....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....r has accordingly redeemed the goods. 7) It is brought to our notice that after the passing of the final order by the Commissioner (Appeals), Aslam had challenged both the order in original as also the final order passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) and the Tribunal has set aside the said orders to the extent that applies to the case of Aslam. Further appeal filed by the revenue aga....
TaxTMI