Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2012 (8) TMI 651

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....K.S. Ravishankar, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Judgment per : Ravi Malimath, J.]. - This appeal is by the revenue being aggrieved by the order of the Tribunal [2009 (16) S.T.R. 691 (Tri. - Bang.)] holding that the assessee are not liable to pay service tax under the category of GTA (Goods Transport Agency). 2. The assessee is a partnership firm engaged in the business of exporting ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....enalty. The assessee submitted his reply. The assessing authority came to the conclusion that the service provider is a Goods Transport Agency and not merely a truck owner or operator. That Goods Transport Agency themselves can be the owners of the truck. Therefore, the plea of the assessee was rejected and it was concluded that the services received by the assessee is a taxable service. According....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., 2004 and not as per the statutory provisions of law was right in holding that the Respondents were not liable to pay Service Tax under the category of "GTA" ? (ii)    Whether the order of the CESTAT was right in holding that the Respondents were not liable to Service Tax under the category of "Goods Transport Agency", contrary to the statutory provisions of law i.e., Section 65....