Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2012 (8) TMI 610

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) on the issue raised in this appeal.   So the question that arises for consideration in this intra court appeal is whether it involves any substantial question of law within the meaning of section 260A ibid ?   Having heard the learned counsel for the appellant and on a perusal of record of the case, we are inclined to dismiss the appeal in limine as, in our opinion, the appeal does not involve any substantial question of law as is required to be made out within the meaning of section 260A ibid.   The assessee is a public limited company engaged in the business of purchasing and selling shares.   The issue relates to disallowance of loss to the extent of R....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n Bhai and Co. and the assessee is between two principals. There is no fiction in law that sales price is to be determined on the basis of any market value or break up value. Accordingly, we have no hesitation to hold the transaction is a real transaction and under the circumstances the action of the Assessing Officer is not justified in substituting the sale price by any other price. Accordingly, we hold that the loss disallowed to the extent of Rs. 3,66,804 is not correct and such disallowance made by the Assessing Officer is deleted."   Similarly, so far as another transaction relating to disallowance of Rs.7,08,000 was concerned, the same was also probed by the Tribunal on facts and then while reversing the finding of the Commis....