Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2012 (8) TMI 606

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....M.S. Srinivasa, Advocates, for the Respondent. [Judgment per : N. Kumar, J.]. -  The revenue has preferred this appeal challenging the order passed by the Tribunal [2007 (8) S.T.R. 33 (Tribunal)] which has held that the assessee is not liable to pay Service tax. 2. The assessee M/s. Siemens Vdo Automotive Limited entered into an agreement with M/s. Mannesmann VDO AG, and paid a ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nical assistance for the manufacture of the patented goods, (ii) the grant of rights for use of intellectual property or patent for the manufacture of the patented goods in accordance with the patented technology, (iii) the Company is not engaged in the profession of a Consulting Engineer providing advise, consultancy or technical assistance in one or more disciplines of engineering. The transacti....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....penalty. Aggrieved by the said order, the assessee preferred an appeal to the Tribunal. The Tribunal following its earlier judgments held that no service tax is leviable in the facts of the case and therefore, he set aside the order of the Commissioner and restored the order of the Assistant Commissioner. Aggrieved by the same, the revenue is in appeal. 3. Therefore, the question that aris....