Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2012 (8) TMI 429

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Mahajan,B.J.Agarwal,D. Awasthi,G. Krishna,R.K. Upadhyay,S.Chopra   1. We have heard Sri R.K. Upadhyay, learned counsel for the appellants and Sri R.R. Agrawal, learned counsel appears for the respondent-assessee.   2. The revenue is aggrieved by the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 12.1.2000, which was set-aside the order of Commissioner Income Tax (A), remanding t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... and has found that the assessee had sufficiently explained the surrender of the income which he has subsequently retracted. 5. After assessments were completed, a raid was carried out, at the Nursing Home of the respondent-assessee on 7.12.2004. Some incriminating documents of concealment of income, were discovered. The assessee was not present at the time of inspection. He appeared before the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ave been ignored by the AO while framing the assessment and thus the vary basis for passing the impugned order goes away. The CIT also failed to point out as to why the AO failed to work out the amount of concealed income correctly, rather the AO had made the additions on estimate basis for all the assessment years though there was no seized material indicating suppression of receipts for these as....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ingly. 6. In the result, appeals are allowed." 7. Sri R.K. Upadhyay had relied upon Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, (2000) 243 ITR 83 and Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Kwality Twxtile Associate Pvt. Ltd., (2005) 272 ITR 371. In these cases the Supreme Court and the Madras High Court have discussed the powers of CIT under Section 263 of the Act, to remand the matt....