2012 (7) TMI 206
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....; For respondent:- SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, INCOME TAX. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. JUDGMENT Being aggrieved by Ext.P1 series assessment orders passed by the first respondent, the petitioner approached the second respondent challenging the same which did not turn to be fruitful as desired as evident from Ext.P2 series orders, whereby, some cases were dismissed, though s....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....alments at the rate of Rs.5,00,000/-(Rupees five lakhs), which forms the basis for challenge in this writ petition. 3. Heard the learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents 1, 2 and 4 as well. 4. On going through the materials on record, it is seen that the appeals were preferred by the petitioner before the third respondent as early as on 14.04.2011, while the petition under S....
TaxTMI