TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2012 (7) TMI 54
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nbsp; Mr. Sanjay Kalra, Appraiser (A.R) Per: S.S. Kang 1. Heard both sides. 2. Both the appeals are filed against the common impugned order. Therefore, they are being taken up together. 3. Appellant M/s Kilitch Company (Pharma) Ltd is manufacturing P&P medicament falling under Chapter 30 of the Central Excise Tariff on job work basis for M/s Kilitch Drugs (I) Ltd and paying duty as....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Thereafter the adjudicating authority issued a Corrigendum on 16.12.2003 to the effect that in the adjudication order dated 24.9.2003 the name of the party mentioned in para 23 (ii) of the adjudication order i.e. M/s Kilitch Drug (I) Ltd may be read as M/s Kilitch Co (Pharma) Ltd. The Commissioner (Appeals) dismissed the appeals filed by the appellants. 4. The contention of the appellan....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....iled by Revenue against Remide Pharma Ltd was dismissed by the Honble Supreme Court reported in 2007 (207) ELT A 183 (SC). 6. The contention of the appellant is that in view of the above decisions of the Honble Supreme Court the appellant M/s Kilitch Co (Pharma) Ltd is paying appropriate duty. Hence the demand is not sustainable. 7. The Revenue relied upon the findings of the Comm....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....st and also imposed a penalty. A penalty is also imposed on M/s Kilitch Co (Pharma) Ltd. Both the appellants filed appeals before the Commissioner (Appeals). Subsequently, a Corrigendum was issued on 16.12.2003 which reads as follows: CORRIGENDUM TO ORDER-IN-ORIGINAL No. 18/RKS (ADDK.)2003/MIV. Sub: Demand of duty in respect of the goods manufactured on loan Licence basis by M/....