2012 (6) TMI 423

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er he submits that the matter was first heard on 27.7.11 and as it was treated as part heard, subsequently the said Bench was specifically constituted for hearing of the matter. The matter was heard by the said Bench for a continuous period on two dates i.e. 8th and 9th November, 2011. He draws our attention to a detailed order passed by the Bench on 8.11.11 as also to another order passed on 9.11.11 recording facts and arguments and indicating that the arguments stand concluded. The matter was reserved for pronouncement on 11.1.12. The said two Misc. orders passed on 8th and 9th November, 2011 were issued by the Registry on 1.12.11.   2. As per the learned Senior Advocate, they were given liberty in the open Court on 9.11.11, to fi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he appeal finally. He also submits that a period of six months from the last date of conclusion of the argument has still not expired and in the interest of justice, the matter be referred back to the original Bench who heard the same and reserved the orders.   4. We find from the Note sheet that original Bench who heard the matter vide their note sheet order dated 22.2.12 released the case for hearing of the Misc. application which stand subsequently filed by the applicant. As such, it is further seen that learned Member (Judicial) directed the Registry to place the file before the Hon'ble President since the matter is requiring rehearing in view of the Misc. application. Thereafter, the file was placed before the Hon'ble President....