Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2012 (6) TMI 124

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... FOR THE REVENUE.   Per Shri S.K.Gaule   Heard both sides.   2. The Applicant/Appellant filed this Appeal against the Order-in-Appeal No. 54/BOL/10 dated 25.03.2010 whereby the learned Commissioner (Appeals) has dismissed the appeal as non-maintainable, since it was filed beyond the time-limit prescribed under Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944.   3. The con....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion of the learned AR is that from the face of the Order-in-Appeal it is clear that the Order-in-Original dated 23.02.2009 was issued on 27.02.2009 and the appeal was filed in the Office of the Commissioner (Appeals) on 01.06.2009. Hence, it was rightly dismissed as time-barred.   5. We find from the Range Superintendent s letter that the impugned Order-in-Original was handed over to the a....