2012 (6) TMI 93
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Proceedings were initiated against the appellant for recovery of Rs. 9,11,520/- which culminated into an Order-in-Original No. 26/2008-S.T., dated 28-11-2008 confirming the same and the appellant has filed an appeal against this decision. The request for stay made by the appellant in that case which involved the demand from 2003-04 onwards and included this amount of Rs. 9,11,520/- also was allowe....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....terest. 3. The ld. Counsel for the appellant submitted that the issue as to whether the appellant was liable to pay Rs. 9,11,520/- during the year 2006-07 is before the Tribunal and stay against the recovery of the same has already been granted. In these circumstances, initiation of proceedings by the Revenue that adjustment of Rs. 4,82,768/- being the excess is not correct. The ground taken....