Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2012 (5) TMI 509

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....umber of the service provider. A part of the Service Tax has been denied on the ground that the same was not actually paid at the time of availment of credit and was subsequently discharged by service provider along with interest. As regards first issue that though the Commissioner (Appeals) has taken into account the Tribunal's judgment in the case of ITC Ltd. v. CCE, Hyderabad = (2009) 22 STT 282 (Bang-CESTAT) = 2010 (17) S.T.R. 146 (T), he has not followed the same on the ground that Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Maruti Suzuki Ltd., 2009 (240) E.L.T. 641 (S.C.), has held that the services on which the credit stand availed must have nexus with the final product. The said approach of the Commissioner (Appeals) stand assailed by the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....2010 (20) S.T.R. 346 (Tri-Ahmd.) (e)     CCE, Hyderabad v. Voith Turbo Pvt. Ltd., 2011 (21) S.T.R. 52 (Tri.-Bang.) (f)      Brakes India Ltd. v. CCE, Mysore, 2010-TIOL-817-CESTAT-BANG (g)     Ultratech Cement Ltd. v. CCE, Bhavnagar, 2010 (258) E.L.T. 266 (Tri-Ahmd.) = 2011 (22) S.T.R. 578 (Tribunal) (h)    CCE, Nagpur v. Ultratech Cement Ltd., 2010-TIOL-745-HC-MUM-S.T. = 2010 (20) S.T.R. 577 (Bom.) (i)      Coca Cola India Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE, Pune, 2009 (242) E.L.T. 168 (Bom.) = 2009 (15) S.T.R. 657 (Bom.) (j)      Semco Electrical Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE, Pune, 2010 (18) S.T.R. 177 (Tri.-Mum.). 2.&em....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... between the services and the manufactured goods, the input credit is admissible. In view of the above, I hold that the services availed by the appellant in respect of Effluent Treatment Plant are admissible input services and the CENVAT Credit of Rs. 1,01,797/- (Rupees One Lakh, One Thousand, Seven Hundreds and Ninety Seven Only) is admissible to the appellant. 3. As regards dis-allowance of CENVAT Credit of Rs. 3,50,286/- (Rupees Three Lakhs, Fifty Thousands, Two Hundreds and Eighty Six Only) and of Rs. 56,374/- (Rupees Fifty Six Thousands, Three Hundreds and Seventy Four Only), it is not clear from the impugned order of the Commissioner (Appeals) that as to whether the same is denied on the ground of procedural lapses or on th....