2012 (5) TMI 356

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er passed by Commissioner (Appeals) vide which he has rejected the revenue appeal, Revenue has further filed the present appeal.   2. It is seen that the respondents is Director of M/s. C. G. Ispat Pvt. Ltd., which are engaged in the manufacture of MS channels and beams. They accepted the charges of clandestine removal of their final product and deposited the duty of Rs.6,06,149/- along with....