Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2011 (2) TMI 1271

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....m reliefs/directions. As I plan to dispose of the main appeal today itself on merits, no further orders are called for in the present applications. Accordingly, the present applications stand disposed of. Co. Appl. No. 1969/2010 In this application, respondents have prayed for stay of proceedings initiated against them by third parties under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. In my opinion, no relief can be granted against third parties in the present application. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed. Co. A. (SB) 43/2009 1. The present appeal has been filed under section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short 'the Act') challenging the order dated 20-11-2007 passed by the Company Law Bo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....members of appellant-company on the record date, that means, 18-3-1997, the respondents were not entitled to bonus shares declared by the appellant-company in its Annual General Meeting held on 16-12-1996. 6. Mr. Nagesh further submits that the petition preferred by the respondents before the CLB was barred by limitation as it had not been filed within a period of two months as mandated by section 111(2) of the Act. Mr. Nagesh also submits that even if the respondents' petition were to be treated as having been filed under sub-section (4) of section 111 of the Act, then also the period of limitation of three years had expired. In this connection, Mr. Nagesh relies upon a judgment of Kerala High Court in Duroflex Ltd. v. Johnny Mathew [20....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... ****** (2) The transferor or transferee, or the person who gave intimation of the transmission by operation of law, as the case may be, may appeal to the [Tribunal] against any refusal of the company to register the transfer or transmission, or against any failure on its part within the period referred to in sub-section (1), either to register the transfer or transmission or to send notice of its refusal to register the same. ****** (4) If- (a )the name of any person- (i )is without sufficient cause, entered in the register of members of a company, or (ii )after having been entered in the register, is without sufficient cause, omitted therefrom; or (b )default is made, or unnecessary delay takes place, in entering i....