Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2011 (9) TMI 823

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Veeraiyan: Heard both sides on the stay petition. 2. The applicant procures sugar cane from the fields of cane growers. Investigation revealed that during the period from 1.1.2005 to 5.5.2006, the applicant has collected Rs.43,91,673/- towards freight charges from the cane growers. On this amount, the original authority confirmed the service tax amount of Rs.1,12,396/- along with interest a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of the Commissioner (Appeals) in his order. 5. On perusal of the records, prima facie it appears that the amounts paid to the transporters by the applicant were on behalf of the cane growers. The records including show-cause notice, order-in-original and order-in-appeal do not indicate as to the persons on whom freight bills, if any, were raised. In the absence of this information and in view o....