2011 (6) TMI 561

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....A, for the Appellant. None , for the Respondent. [Order per : Akil Kureshi, J. (Oral)]. - Revenue is in appeal against the judgment of the CESTAT dated 7-5-2010 [2010 (19) S.T.R. 447 (Tribunal)] raising following questions for our consideration : "(a)  Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal has committed substantial error of law in holding that recommendi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lude that the appeal filed by the revenue is not maintainable? (d)    Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal has committed substantial error of law by ignoring the application for condonation of delay and not deciding the said application before passing impugned order dismissing the appeal of the revenue on the ground that the appeal is not filed in prop....