2012 (4) TMI 301
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t. ORAL JUDGMENT (PER J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) 1. This appeal was admitted on 6th October, 2005 on the following questions of law:- (i) Whether the CESTAT was correct in law in holding that the amount of duty paid vide TR-6 Challan No.39/92-93 dated 9-6- 1992 is deposit and not the duty ? (ii) Whether an amount of Rs.2 lacs paid vide TR-6 Challan No.39/92-93 dated....
TaxTMI