2011 (4) TMI 1098

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... for the Appellant. [Judgment per : Ramesh Ranganathan, J.]. - This appeal, under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, is preferred against Final Order No. 1314 of 2007 dated 16-11-2007 of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore (CESTAT) which arose out of the Order-in-Appeal No. 66 of 2005, dated 24-3-2005 passed by the Commissioner of Customs & Central Exc....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....gment of the Tribunal in Jaypee Rwea Plant v. CCE, Raipur - 2003 (57) RLT 739 (LB) = 2003 (159) E.L.T. 553 (Tri. - LB), held that the Revenue's appeals were liable to be rejected. The CESTAT noted that the Commissioner (Appeals) had gone into great detail, and had applied the provisions of the Explanation 2 to Rule 2 of the CENVAT Credit Rules and the Board's Circular No. 31/90-CX. 8, dated 31-5-1....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd sub-heading No. 6801.10 of the First Schedule to the Tariff Act; (ii)     components, spares and accessories of the goods specified at (i) above; (iii)    moulds and dies; used in the factory of the manufacturer of the final products, but does not include any equipment or appliance used in an office. 4. It is evident therefrom that "capital go....