2012 (4) TMI 67

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Malhotra, Advocates for the respondent.   Per: Shri D. N. Panda:   Learned DR submits that the first appellate authority held that the goods shall fall under the heading 2501 instead of the same falling under the heading 2106. The goods covered by tariff item 2106 is food preparations not elsewhere specified or included whereas the tariff item 2501 speaks about salt (including tabl....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dy. The goods in question is the nature s gift reduces deficiency of certain mineral in the body. Therefore, his prayer is that ld. Commissioner(Appeals) having examined the goods in terms of the nature thereof has come to appropriate conclusion for classification and that does need not be disturbed..   3. Heard both sides and perused the record.   4. Learned DR for the revenue rea....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ces, stand of respondent does not appear to be devoid on merit..   5. We had anxiety in the course of hearing to find out edibility of the goods and whether is fit for human consumption. Revenue s ground does not discard the claim of human consumption and utility of the goods for the said purpose even though such goods are lying in custody of Revenue for long time. .Once we are satisfied t....