Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2011 (4) TMI 1070

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pondent Per:  Shri B.S.V. Murthy, Member (Technical)     The appellant imported two bottle decorating machines and availed CENVAT credit of Rs.23,33,782/- during the year 2002-03 and 2004-05.  Subsequently, the appellant exported the machines.  In the impugned order the appellant has been required to pay the CENVAT credit amount utilised by them on the ground ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....oduced by the appellant are not acceptable.   3. After hearing the ld. counsel, we find that once the appellant submitted production report and other evidence it was necessary for the lower authority to verify the same and record his observation.  There is no observation at all as regards these evidences and why the same are not acceptable.  Since the documentary evidence has no....