Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2011 (8) TMI 847

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....unal was justified in deleting the addition of Rs.54 lakhs made in the hands of the assessee is the question raised in this appeal.   2. The assessee Smt.Thakurdevi S. Bajaj (since deceased-represented by her son) was owner of a property at Khetwadi, Mumbai. The said property consisted of several tenants including a firm known as Khemraj Shrikrishnandas consisting of two partners, namely t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he assessing officer. On further appeal filed by the assessee, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that it was not a case of deemed gift and accordingly decided the issue in favour of the assessee. Being aggrieved by the aforesaid order, the Revenue has filed the present appeal.   6. According to the Revenue, Rs.54 lakhs paid to the son by the assessee under a colourable device constitu....