Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2011 (7) TMI 827

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....., for the Appellant. Shri R.K. Gupta, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.S. Kang, Vice-President]. -  Heard both sides. Appellant filed this Appeal against the Order-in-Appeal passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) whereby the order rejecting the refund claim of the Appellant is upheld. 2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that Appellant entered into agreement with....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ipal the Appellants are entitled for commission in respect of the goods and the agreement is termed as consignment stockiest and therefore took us to the various clauses of the agreement to submit that the Applicants are providing the taxable service. 5. We have gone through the agreement dated 1-6-1999. We find that the Appellants are appointed as consignment stockiest for selling resins.....