Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2011 (7) TMI 808

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....is appeal is filed by the Revenue being aggrieved by the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench 'B' in ITA No. 1416/Bang/2003 dated 15-9-2005. 2. This appeal was admitted on 26-7-2007 to consider the substantial question of law framed in ITA No.800/2006. We find that ITA No.800/2006 was dismissed at the stage of admission on 31-1-2011 and is not connected wit....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....el appearing for the appellant submitted that the above said substantial questions of law have been answered in favour of the Revenue by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Joint CIT v. Rolta India Ltd. [2011] 330 ITR 470/196 Taxman 594/9 taxmann.com 36 wherein after considering the provisions of sections 115J, 115JA and 234B & 234C of the Act, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that in view of t....