Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2011 (9) TMI 697

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Appellant. [Judgment per : N. Kumar, J.]. - The Revenue has preferred this appeal challenging the orders passed by the Appellate Authority reducing the penalties imposed by the assessing authorities, from Rs. 1,28,558/- to Rs. 50,000/-. 2. The material on record discloses that the assessee was providing security services to M/s. BSNL, Mangalore. Though the assessee had paid the S....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....efault, he accepted the cause shown as constituting sufficient cause and therefore, reduced the penalty to Rs. 50,000/-. Aggrieved by the said order, the Revenue preferred an appeal to the Tribunal, which was confirmed in the said order. 3. When two fact finding authorities have held the non-payment of service tax was not intentional, it was not with any intention to avoid tax, considered ....