Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2012 (2) TMI 240

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....g to wind up the Respondent-Company, which is incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and having its office at 16/2, OVH Road, Basavanagudi, Bangalore-560 004. 2. It is contended in the petition that the petitioner was an employee of the Respondent-Company and that the Respondent-Company was running its business as per the Memorandum of Association & Articles of Association of the Company afte....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... compensation of Rs. 12,500/- per month all inclusive effective 16.7.2001.  4.  The time required to be spent by you on the above matters will be to the extent of approximately 4 - 5 days in a month depending on our needs.  5.  In the event you are required to handle any matter for the company outside the corporate office, actual out of pocket conveyance expenses incurred for....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tending inter alia that the claim is time barred. 6. Heard Sri C.K. Nandakumar, learned Counsel for the Petitioner regarding admission and Sri Premnath Rai, learned Counsel for the Respondent. 7. It is contended by the Counsel for petitioner that by letters and emails dated 25.9.2007; 18.3.2008; 22.7.2008; 8.9.2008 and 4.10.2008, there has been a clear admission of liability by the Managing Dire....