2011 (8) TMI 694

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Respondent Per Archna Wadhwa (for the Bench):     All the four appeals are being disposed of by a common order as the  issue involved is identical.   A very short dispute of classification of goods imported by the appellants is involved. 2. As per facts on record, the appellants have imported 'Omni Flow computers' by classifying the same under heading 90....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ng order so as to enable them to know the basis for adopting the different classification from the previous one. Inspite of such a request, no  appealable orders were passed by the proper officer thus compelling the appellants to file an appeal against the assessed Bills of entry. The appeals filed by the appellants  stand rejected by the Commissioner (Appeals).  Hence, the present ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....p; in the impugned order. As such, the request  to set aside the  impugned order and remand the matter to original authority is being made. 5. Learned DR appearing for the revenue agrees that speaking order should  have been passed by the original  adjudicating authority  as requested for  by the appellants but submits that the appellants were given a proper oppor....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ppeal filed by the Appellant is liable to be rejected. " 7. As is clear from the above, there is no discussion as to how the goods imported by the appellants fit into the said Chapter  Note. We also note that other pleas advanced by the appellants have not been discussed and considered by the appellate authority.   As such, we agree with the learned advocate that the impugned or....